India and Pakistan share several major rivers, and to manage the complex and often sensitive issue of water sharing, the two countries signed a landmark agreement:
The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) – 1960
Signed: September 19, 1960
Brokered by: The World Bank (then the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development)
Parties: India and Pakistan
Main Rivers Involved: The Indus River System (6 rivers in total)
Key Features:
-
Division of Rivers:
-
Western Rivers (allocated to Pakistan): Indus, Jhelum, Chenab
-
Eastern Rivers (allocated to India): Ravi, Beas, Sutlej
-
-
Usage Rights:
-
India can use Western rivers for non-consumptive purposes (e.g., irrigation, hydroelectric power, navigation) without interfering with flow.
-
Pakistan has unrestricted use of the Western rivers.
-
India has full control over the Eastern rivers but must allow some flow downstream under certain conditions.
-
-
Dispute Resolution Mechanism:
-
Permanent Indus Commission (PIC): A bilateral body for regular meetings and information sharing.
-
Neutral Expert: Appointed by the World Bank for technical disputes.
-
Court of Arbitration: For more serious legal disagreements.
-
Why It Matters:
-
Stability: The IWT has survived three wars and remains one of the few consistently respected agreements between the two countries.
-
Tensions: Disputes arise periodically, especially over India’s hydroelectric projects in Jammu & Kashmir (e.g., Baglihar and Kishanganga dams), which Pakistan claims may violate the treaty.
-
Climate Change & Population Growth: Both countries face increasing water stress, making the treaty’s future more important—and more contested.
Recent Developments:
-
India’s Position: Post-2016 (after the Uri attack), India considered re-evaluating the treaty, suggesting it might maximize its legal use of the Western rivers.
-
Pakistan’s Appeals: Pakistan has brought several disputes to international forums, notably challenging India’s Kishanganga and Ratle dam projects.
-
World Bank’s Role: The Bank has intermittently paused mediation to encourage bilateral resolution but remains a facilitator.